Our Letter to the Court and Community

alex_susan_alan.jpgMy name is Susan Barich. I live in Santa Cruz. I am 56 years old, and I run a technology business incubator for the city of Marina near Monterey where we assist start-up businesses. I am the mother of Alex Baer who was killed in August in Santa Barbara as the passenger of a vehicle driven by Jessica Binkerd. Jessica is now before the court on felony charges. She will soon be sentenced.

Since Alex’s death I wear his watch to work every day. I wear his sweatshirt in the evenings. I can still smell him on his sweatshirt. I keep his desk chair in my office. It has his DNA on it. Some days, in honor of his wacky and improvisational sense of humor, I wear the silly, sparkly party shirt I gave him for Christmas. I wear his jeans horseback riding. They’re long enough to fit over my boots. The waist fits me perfectly. I wear his cap out in the sun. Pictures of Alex loop continuously on both of my computer screens. Alex with his sister at my parents’ 60th wedding anniversary party; Alex conversing with the wooden statues of old men on the front porch of the Ulapalakua store; Alex and his dog, Sadie. The boys tell me his bike is a junker, but I can’t quite part with it. There has always been a special place in my heart for my boys’ bicycles. A boy’s bike represents his going out into the world. How he makes his way. How he gets to where he has decided he wants to go.

Some days I stand in my closet and scream. I fear the police will come. The songs I love reduce me to sobbing in my car or blubbering in the bathtub. Alex will never live that love song now. Tears streamed down my cheeks all through the Shamu Show at Sea World. In the night I imagine his last moment of consciousness, panic and a sudden impact as his breath is blown from him by the crush of a Lexus.

As pitiful and incredibly saddened as I am by Alex’s death, the only time I feel angry and helpless is when I think of further suffering imposed by this horrible accident. I feel angry and helpless when I think that Jessica Binkerd, who must shoulder for the rest of her life the responsibility for Alex’s death, may suffer further at the hands of our justice system. As a parent and as a human being, my heart breaks for Jessica. She has been given the nearly unbearable to bear.

This is Alex and Jessica’s tragedy. It is they who have truly suffered. The two of them worked together at Deveraux caring for autistic children. Although I do not know Jessica, her work with these children tells me that, like Alex, she is an unusually talented and giving person. Should we throw that away? Should we impose a penalty that ensures she will never use those talents to make our community a better place? Jessica completed a 4-year program at the University of California by the age of 22. That tells me she’s not a drunk.

It is my belief, and the belief of Alex’s family and friends, that the car crash that took Alex’s life was an accident, regardless of the circumstances. Had Jessica not been drinking, it may have been avoided, but it may not have been. The cars may still have stopped too quickly in front of her for her to stop. We have all come extremely close to the rear end of another car in the case of a quick stop.

Be that as it may, it does not matter any more. What matters now is how we, as the elders of our culture and our community, handle the future of a young woman who made a mistake. We hold her in our hands. Do we keep her down or lift her up? Will it be destructive to our community and society to send a message of compassion? I think not. Have we, as a generation, crammed our kids into an intolerable society of laws, as my sister put it? What is OUR responsibility for this tragic epidemic of drinking among our children? Let us, with forgiveness, love and compassion, guide our culture down a new road that shows our children that we value them, so they don’t feel they have to drink to have fun.

I have spoken with several of Alex’s close friends, with his brothers and his sister, with his aunts, uncles, cousins, his grandparents, and his father and step-father. We concur. Without in any way excusing drunk driving, we ask for leniency for Jessica. We ask for a judicial finding that is appropriate to the contribution that Jessica Binkerd could make to our society if we give her the opportunity. We ask that the Court allow us to express compassion, forgiveness, understanding and love toward her and her family. We ask that she be able to tell us that she is sorry, and that we can have the grace to offer her forgiveness. We ask that she be allowed to create something as powerful and beautiful with her life as this tragedy has been bleak and horrific. We ask that this accident not be allowed to cause more loss. Our society, our culture, our community need Jessica Binkerd to build her life’s work around helping and preserving other young people, around saving lives. Her life’s work, which is now defined by a mistake in a moment that killed a friend and colleague.We believe that the fact that Jessica will have to bear the burden of California’s strike laws and felony convictions for the rest of her life, that these will inform and define the rest of her life, and her knowledge that she is responsible for Alex’s death, comprise sufficient punishment without adding prison. We recommend probation and community service.

Thank you,Susan Barich and Family

4 Responses to “Our Letter to the Court and Community”

  1. David Howard Says:

    I read the article in the LA Times today. I was impressed with your compassion. Check out my website if you get a chance. It’s about brutal murders, but it also explores some of the crime and punishment issues you are interested in and the feelings of homicide victims.

    Good Luck,

    David
    http://pazpeacesalaamshalom.blogspot.com/
    http://femicideintheusa.blogspot.com/

  2. Charles Morris Says:

    Susan,

    I read the article in today’s Los Angeles Times about the horrible tragedy that you and your family have had to endure. I also think, as you do, that it’s a tragedy for Jessica and her family, not necessarily because she got drunk, because she chose to drink and drive after the fact, and made that poor decision.

    I run a state-approved Drinking Driver Program in Hollywood, Behavioral Systems Southwest, and we currently have close to 700 clients. We have new people coming in everyday, and people graduating and some still repeating their bad choices and coming back as 2nd and 3rd Offenders.

    Though we hear about numerous issues everyday as reasons as to why our clients received their DUI, the bottom line is about the “bad choice” that they made. Recently, we have tried to highlight personal responsibility in our curriculum, because though we can’t save many others from making bad choices, maybe we can help a handful who make good choices, and therefore don’t drink and drive, which in turn might save a life or two.

    I feel as you do that Jessica could be put to better use if she were sentenced to use her efforts and time to promote knowledge and education about the dangers of drinking and driving. To me, hearing from someone who killed a person because of a poor choice is more effective than knowing that the person who made that poor choice is now in jail. She thereby becomes a statistic and not a living, breathing reminder of lives ruined and lives changed, and in that sense she becomes that face of tragedy. If she’s incarcerated only her jailers and fellow inmates get to see that face of tragedy. The public needs to see her, specifically those who are in danger of repeating her offense.

    From personal experience, statistics are not effective in counseling sessions. Almost all of my clients know they could kill someone if they drive after drinking. They all know they will do jail time if they kill someone. They knew this before they drank and drove. That didn’t stop them. If Jessica does 7 years. That statistic will not stop them.

    What is effective in a classroom, counseling session, is people talking, conversing and seeing the results of the effects of drinking and driving. Our clients are affected by MADD meetings, visiting the morgue, going to A.A. meetings, they are participating in the end results of drinking and driving, they aren’t just looking at a newspaper headline which says, “One more drinker driver jailed for murder.” That paper gets quickly pushed aside.

    I feel that Jessica out in the community, lecturing, speaking, making films. Icould be helpful. I also feel that you are being helpful by sharing your experiences as the mother of a young man killed by this offense. I’m planning to use your words from this blog in some of our curriculum. If you’d like to write a letter to drinking drivers, specifically, it’d be something we could hand out to all our clients.

    Drinking and driving is a problem in our society, and the states have been putting offenders in jail for a long time. Yet, the problem continues. There have to be other ways to attack this, because jail sentences are not scaring anyone from drinking and driving. That statistic isn’t real to our clients. A living face of tragedy such as Jessica is real. She needs to put to use the horrible lessons that she has learned and try to disseminate her feelings to others. Can she be as effective behind bars? I don’t think so. Does she need to be punished? Yes, absolutely, but can’t we find a more proactive punishment than putting her away where only her closest family will remember her? People need to be reminded that drinking and driving is a tragedy and it can happen to any of us, at any time, by social and/or moderate drinkers who make poor choices. Jessica is a great example of this. I hope the judge can see that she can be used more for public good, and I hope that the judge can be creative enough to punish her while maybe using her to save someone else.

    Charles E. Morris
    Program Director, Behavioral Systems Southwest

  3. susanbarich Says:

    Charles:
    Thank you for your thoughts. And thank you for the work you do. You bring the voice of experience to this argument that I simply do not have. We appreciate your participation in the blog.

    If I forget your offers of how we may work together, please don’t let it drop. I am amazingly discombobulated right now. I may need for you to get back to us.
    Thanks,
    Susan

  4. Don Mac Donald Says:

    Dear Susa Barich,
    I am sorry for your loss, and congratulate you on your stand against imprisonment as a way to encourage any person to stop addictive behavior. In fact, a prison term is more likely to halt a real recovery, deepen any mental and emotional disorders related to drug or alcohol use, increase physical illness with and violence, and deepen the prisoners contact with addiction, alcohol, and drugs. (All of which are found in prison.) Upon discharge, the person, now damaged beyond the crime itself, with it’s shame, stigma and shock, is in a more incapable position to effectively manage their own sobriety, and actually MORE likely to have a long-term problem with addiction.
    Your well-meaning and correct stance, though based on solid instincts about the worth of an individual and how people actually quit drinking, has a big blind spot. The legal and moralistic forces at work are dominant in the world of law enforcement and prisons. This leads easily to the surviving person from the crash being dealt with as a non-person, usefull only to send a message to others, and in their view, disposable.
    To effectively counter this destructive thinking, you need more than moral anguish and spiritual quotations. You need up to date contacts and data about the success of treatment instaed of prison. The face that professional, evidence-based treatrment works, and jail does not, needs to be presented as a hard, verifiable treatment plan, with jail always a possibility if it is violated.
    Please feel free to contact me for specific suggestions for a treatment-based plan to present to the court, if you wish. I am a research counselor at The Matrix Institute on Addictions in West Los Angeles. We are the Intensive Outpatient Program for UCLA Medical Center, and here I have had the chance to do statistically studied treatment projects for NIDA and for the Proposition 36 program. I have three years of work directly with court-mandated Prop. 36 clients, and at Matrix we are often working with individual recovery clients who are facing extreme legal risks, and for whom treatment must work.
    Any suggestions I can contribute (free of charge) I would be pleased to think about. My reason is that through a tragic loss for you, you are put in a cutting-edge position that can further the advancement of how those in need, and those in power, can come to a better understanding of what recovery is, and how people learn to cope with dangerous dependencies.
    You might also want to look up Self Management & Recovery Training, an abstinince-based group that has a meeting in Santa Cruz. (smartrecovery.org) The Matrix work-book is distributed by Hazelden, and UCLA holds the statistics on Prop. 36.
    I can be reached at Matrix: 310:278-0276. Just ask for Don Mac Donald.

    Thank You. You are doing the right thing. Don Mac Donald, cadac II

Leave a Reply