Alan and I, along with Jessica’s mother, Melanie, showed up for court on April 8 only to find Judge Lodge was in the hospital. The case was continued to April 15. We all showed again, only to find that the new judge, Eskin, is going to wait a couple of weeks to see if Lodge gets back. If he is not back, Eskin will have had time to review all the materials and will make a judgement on the resentencing.
So this week, Smith said that Eskin should not hear the matter, because this was a very complicated case (made complicated only by her) and Lodge would be back in a week. So Steve said, no, he had spoken with Lodge’s clerk, and Lodge wouldn’t be back till the 28th.
Eskin asked Steve what his concern over Lodge’s judgement was (paraphrasing here). Steve said that Lodge intends to now impose the most severe sentence on the manslaughter charge, when he had originally given Jessica the lightest sentence on it on her merits. So Smith said, no, he didn’t say he would do that, and then Steve grabbed his binder and read from the transcript of the hearing in early February where Lodge said, “This is the most aggravated case of vehicular manslaughter I’ve ever seen. . . I intend to be very strict.”
Eskin pushed Steve again about why he did not want to wait for Lodge. Steve cocked his hip, pulled his jacket back, put his left hand on his hip, and put his right hand on the podium and said, “Well to be quite honest, I have seen the file on this case. Judge Lodge has marked up, underlined and checked off points in Ms. Smith’s briefs. None of the defense materials, the 45 letters, my briefs, have been touched. He hasn’t read them.”
Then Steve pointed out to Eskin that Jessica earns 2 days credit for every day she spends in prison, but only 6 days for every 4 she spends in county jail, and that she has been sitting in county jail now since the beginning of February losing credits. Eskin expressed concern about this. He seems like a very thoughtful guy.
Then Smith reiterated that the hearing could not go forth under Eskin, because Lodge had the benefit of all the live testimony. She said that a piece of paper could not convey the emotions of live testimony. Eskin didn’t seem to like that at all. I think he feels he could do a pretty good job if he read everything.
But I believe Eskin’s decision to give Lodge till the 29th to return to work, and then for him to take the case, if Lodge is NOT back, is a wise and, dare I say it, judicious, decision. In the moment, it was disappointing for Jessica, who is paraded in in shackles every time this happens. The emotional roller coaster is hard on all of us, but must be the worst for her.
So, we will be there on the 29th at 1:30, and we will have statements to make — to whichever judge. I hope that if it is Lodge, that he is listening.
Susan